|
|
|
Class Claims 'QuickPick' Bets Didn't List Last Horse
Law Firm News |
2008/06/03 07:54
|
Scientific Games' machines excluded the last horse from every race in its QuickPick program for more than 6 months, a class action claims in Superior Court.
The complaint states in Paragraph 11 that the QuickPick program excluded the last horse in every race from the betting slips.
Two paragraphs later, it states, The glitch was finally admitted when a Bay Meadows bettor played 1,300 quick picks and noticed that not one included the number 20 horse.
The complaint does not elucidate specifically whether the last horse was excluded in races with fewer than 20 horses, though Paragraph 11 indicates that was the case.
The named plaintiff claims that Although Defendants were aware of the problem as of Nov. 1, 2007, the Defendants failed to notify the betting public. Instead, the Defendants kept the problem to itself [sic] and attempted to correct 'for' the problem with 'new software.' The glitch was finally admitted when a Bay Meadows bettor played 1,300 quick picks and noticed that not one included the number 20 horse. The public was not alerted to the problem until after May 19, 2008 - months after the Defendants knew of the problem and week after the Bay Meadows better complained to the State Board. As a result of the 'glitch,' thousands of Class members paid for 'QuickPick' bets without any chance of a 'QuickPick' payment.
Named plaintiff Angel Romero says he bought QuickPick tickets for races at Fairplex Race Track, Santa Anita, Hollywood park and Pacific Coast Quarter Horse, all in Southern California.
He is represented by William Audet of San Francisco and Thomas Ferlauto with King amp; Ferlauto of Los Angeles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisville Slugger Crippled Little Leaguer
Law Firm News |
2008/05/30 14:03
|
Higher bat speed, and the resulting ball speed off an aluminum bat gave a Little Leaguer insufficient time to react, and the boy suffered cardiac arrest when hit by a batted ball during a game, the boy's family claims in lawsuits against Hillerich amp; Bradsby dba Louisville Slugger, and the Little League.
Aluminum bats have been controversial for precisely this reason, and because some baseball purists say the lighter bats give batters an unfair edge. In this case, the Domalewski family claims Steven, 12, was injured and hospitalized during a June 6, 2006 game in Wayne, N.J., from a ball bit by a Louisville Slugger TPX Platinum bat. The 31-inch bat weighs 19 ozs., the complaint states. Traditional wooden bats generally weight 30 ozs. or more.
As a result of the blow to his chest, Steven went into cardiac arrest ... was resuscitated and transported to St. Joseph's Medical Center in Paterson, according to the claim in Passaic County Court. It claims Steven suffered from anoxic encephalopathy secondary to comotio cordis and is multiple handicapped.
The Domalewskis accuse the defendants, among other things, with consumer fraud: minimizing the dangers of aluminum bats, though knowing of them. They demand punitive damages. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrats Sue Georgia Over Photo Voter Law
Law Firm News |
2008/05/27 13:53
|
The Georgia Democratic Party claims enforcement of the state's photo ID requirement violates the Georgia Constitution by discriminating against hundreds of thousands of registered voters, black voters particularly, who do not have driver's licenses, passports or other state-issued ID.
Unlike the civil rights claims of the 1960s, which appealed to the federal government to override racist Southern laws, this complaint asserts no claims that arise under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States.
Plaintiffs claim the state's 2006 Photo ID Act - SB 84 - violates the Georgia Constitution because it imposes an unauthorized additional condition on the fundamental right to vote.
They claim the bill discriminates against African-American voters in particular.
And they claim that it is an illegal retroactive law because it applies to citizens of Georgia who were lawfully registered to vote before the effective date of the law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston Wins Ruling In Face Off With Phone Co.
Law Firm News |
2008/05/22 07:32
|
The City of Houston does not have to reimburse Southwestern Bell for moving its telecommunications equipment out of the public right of way, the 5th Circuit ruled.
A three-judge panel held that the Telecommunications Act protects municipalities when they exercise ownership over public rights of way. Therefore, Southwestern Bell is not entitled to be reimbursed for the cost of moving its equipment.
Southwestern Bell had claimed that a Houston ordinance violated the act by requiring telecommunications companies to move facilities at their own expense.
Writing for the panel, Judge Barksdale ruled that in order for the telephone company to prevail, it would have to prove that the act specifically created a right to be reimbursed for the moving of its equipment.
Also, Barksdale ruled that even the local government protection afforded by the act does not indicate a right for telecommunications companies |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Marketing News RSS
